James Bond is one of the most iconic characters to ever
grace the big screen but believe it or not, Mr. Bond actually began life as a
book character (I know, who would’ve thought it?) On the front cover of the
latest printing, Casino Royale states
that ‘there is only one Bond.’ I’m here to tell you that’s absolute nonsense,
there are six different Bonds and I’ve seen all six of them so why is this book
lying to me? Why lie, spy? But enough about taglines full of deceit, I have a
book review to write.
We join British
Secret Service agent, James Bond, as he tries to bankrupt Le Chiffre, the
paymaster for Russian counterintelligence agency, SMERSH. Le Chiffre is a keen
gambler and an extraordinary card player, risking his organisation’s huge cash
flow at the baccarat table. Bond is tasked with defeating Le Chiffre to deplete
SMERSH’s funds. As neither side can afford to lose, the two men realise they
are not just playing for money; they are playing for their lives.
When you
start reading, you are immediately sucked into a world full of glamour,
strolling through the casino, eyes on the rich and powerful winning and losing.
It’s a beautiful place with an ugly underside but for all of Ian Fleming’s
intricate descriptions, I found myself getting bored. There was so much
background information about who was doing what and which country was helping
who that I flipped through the book to see when the action picked up. Then
there was the game of baccarat itself. Mathis, one of Bond’s accomplices,
explains for the benefit of another undercover agent the rules of the game
(though really, I’m sure it was an explanation for the readers who didn’t have
the foggiest clue how to play). I don’t know how but I was more confused after the explanation than I was before
it.
I didn’t
find any of it exciting. I really tried to get into it but I couldn’t. I still
read the whole thing through because I paid good money for it but I was dying
of boredom and confusion the whole way. Even when the main conflict was
resolved, the novel dragged on for about 50 more pages about Bond and his love
interest that had no repercussions for the follow-up novel, Live and Let Die (for which there will
be no review because I found that to be a tedious read too).
As an
avid reader, I’ve spent most of my life trying (and failing) to convince people
that films based on books are never as good as the source material. When it
comes to Bond books though, my argument falls flat on its face. Stick to the
films because they’re awesome.